CFD Analysis of Performance and Emission in a Direct Injection Diesel Engine at Different Piston Bowl Re-Entrant Angle

Jinuchandran, Mar Athanasius College of Engineering; Jyothis. S ,Mar Athanasius College of Engineering; Biju Cherian Abraham ,Mar Athanasius College of Engineering; Jijo Johnson ,Mar Athanasius College of Engineering; Dr. Shajan Kuriakose ,Mar Athanasius College of Engineering

CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), STAR-CD, Re-entrant angle, Piston Bowl Geometry, NOx, Soot

The present works investigates the influence of re-entrant angle in a piston bowl geometry on both engine performance and combustion efficiency in a direct injection (DI) diesel engine using STAR-CD. The analysis was done by varying the reentrant angle of piston bowl between 16.35˚ to 25.35˚. All the other relevant parameters namely, compression ratio, bowl volume, squish clearance, engine speed and the mass of fuel injected were kept constant. It is observed that the in-cylinder pressures and temperatures are higher for 19.35˚ reentrant angle. NOx emissions were observed higher for 22.35˚ reentrant angle. Lower soot emissions were observed for 19.35˚ reentrant angle when compared with the other reentrant angles. The simulation analysis revealed that 19.35˚ reentrant angle is the optimum reentrant angle yielding best performance and lower emissions for the chosen engine geometry. Higher turbulent energy and velocity magnitude levels are obtained with 19.35˚ reentrant angle indicating efficient combustion emphasizing the need for optimized combustion chamber geometry for better performance and emissions.
    [1] Abdul Gafoor C.P., Rajesh Gupta, “Numerical investigation of piston bowl geometry and swirl ratio on emission from diesel engines,” Energy Conversion and Management 101 (2015) 541–551. [2] Raouf Mobasheri, Zhijun Peng,” CFD Investigation of the Effects of Re-Entrant Combustion Chamber Geometry in a HSDI Diesel Engine,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering Vol: 7, No:4, 2013. [3] Jaichandar S, Senthil Kumar P, Annamalai K.,” Combined effect of injection timing and combustion chamber geometry on the performance of a biodiesel fueled diesel engine” Energy 2012;47:388–94. [4] Shi Y, Reitz RD.,” Optimization study of the effects of bowl geometry, spray targeting, and swirl ratio for a heavy-duty diesel engine operated at low and high load,” Int J Engine Res 2008;9(4):325–46. [5] Prasad BVVSU, Sharma CS, Anand TNC, Ravikrishna RV.,” High swirl – inducing piston bowls in small diesel engines for emission reduction,” Appl Energy 2011;88:2355–67. [6] Bapu BR, Saravanakumar L, Prasad BD.,”Effects of combustion chamber geometry on combustion characteristics of a DI diesel engine fueled with calophyllum inophyllum methyl ester,” J Energy Inst 2015. [7] Park SW.,” Optimization of combustion chamber geometry for stoichiometric diesel combustion using a micro genetic algorithm,” Fuel Processing Technology. 2010;91(11):1742-52. [8] D.A. Zumbrunnen, M. Aziz, Convective heat transfer enhancement due to intermittency in an impinging jet, Journal of Heat Transfer 115 (1) (1993) 91–98. [8] Li J., Yang WM., An H., Maghbouli A., Chou SK.,” Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fueled diesel engines,” Fuel, 120:66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.005. [9] Jesús B., José VP., Antonio G., Javier MS.,”An experimental investigation on the influence of piston bowl geometry on RCCI performance and emissions in a heavy-duty engine,” Energy Conversion and Management, 103:1019–1030. [10] Pasupathy Venkateswaran, S., and G. Nagarajan, 2010, “Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD Approach,” Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power 132.12 (2010).
Paper ID: GRDJEV02I070069
Published in: Volume : 2, Issue : 7
Publication Date: 2017-07-01
Page(s): 59 - 66